Anchors in the Storm

Where I left off.


ECONS paper 1: umm question 2 was easy, but apparently i didn't define merit good completely right. so. mixed feelings. hopefully at least like 21/25 or so.
good/ok/bad/fail: 0/2/1/1

PHYSICS mcq paper: easy, though i have 2 careless mistakes.
good/ok/bad/fail: 0/3/1/1

PHYSICS paper 2: fine, though i might be penalised for the diffraction grating graph i think. also definition of damping.
good/ok/bad/fail: 0/4/1/1

ECONS paper 2: screwed up. changed question 5 minutes into the actual 40 minute time, screwed up my graph for the last question and left out one reason for the last quesiton as well. hopefully i can still salvage like a 15 or so.
good/ok/bad/fail: 0/4/2/1


MATHS: fine. i hate the ambiguous case sine rule diagram though. hopefully can get like at least 112 or so out of 120.
good/ok/bad/fail: 0/5/2/1


so it's been an exam period that's left me with very mixed emotions with so many papers being like okay, not good.

---

yesterday, after math, i had 2 conversations that were rather thought provoking. The first was with a close friend which I had sort of planned in the sense that I felt the conversation would be something reasonably beneficial; and the second, a totally random one that yet bore some meaning in an unusual sense.

hence the title of this post. i'll leave it at this.

jk.